Posts in Special Reports
☆ Election roundup (10/14): To all the bonds we've loved before...

Continuing our exclusive analyses, Opp Now contributors feel disappointed that voters signed gov't's (pretty grandiose) love letters to tax hikes and bonds—like SJUSD's Measure R, passing with 63.9%. Could voters' well-meaning “yes's” end up breaking their hearts the bank for everyday Californians? Comments below from: Susan Shelley, Tom Rubin, Mark Burns, and Pierluigi Oliverio.

Read More
☆ Mark Burns: Prop 5’s defeat shields communities from high-interest loans that cost twice as much to pay back (1/2)

Bonds can double repayment costs, burdening property owners for decades, especially in today's higher interest rate environment. So says Silicon Valley realtor Mark Burns, who sat on two school bond oversight committees. Prop 5 and RM4 promised similar oversight bodies, but Burns says they’d only pay “lip service” to the idea of accountability. Prevailing wage requirements, for example, force districts to pay astronomically inflated prices. An Opp Now exclusive Q&A.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (9/14): Voters swept off their feet by alluring tax hikes

Voters rejected Prop 5 this cycle, which would've opened the door to unrestricted gov't borrowing. Yet, other expensive ballot measures like Prop 2 and Measure R (both nobly dressed up as “saving our schools”) were passed. More Opp Now exclusive analyses—of what some perceive as Election 2024's biggest disappointments—below from SVTA's Mark Hinkle, HJTA's Jon Coupal, and CFR's Pat Waite.

Read More
☆ Tom Rubin: Beware the Son-of-RM4, another plea for MTC to spoil its constituents (2/2)

Transit consultant Tom Rubin warns that MTC’s BAHFA could give birth to another ill-conceived prodigality in the billions of dollars. On the 2026 ballot, they may also ask Bay Area voters for a transit tax. Statewide, the legislature could try to amend the constitution just to thwart taxpayer protections, while Sac targets cities who don’t want to stack ‘n pack themselves into dissipation. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ Tom Rubin: Prop 5’s defeat leaves Bay Area’s activist agencies in terrible shape (1/2)

Out-of-touch housing activists failed to broaden their appeal to the everyday taxpayer—could that explain why Prop 5 got “slapped down?” Tom Rubin, co-founder of the grassroots group that likely nudged RM4 off the ballot earlier this year, points out MTC/BAHFA still haven’t gotten the message. They insist on bond money going to prevailing wage contracts, thus inflating the cost of “affordable” housing. An Opp Now exclusive Q&A.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (8/14): Elected officials do as *they* wish, ignore residents’ best interests

Former Palo Alto mayor Lydia Kou and Recovery Education Coalition founder Tom Wolf find it near-inconceivable that many local gov’ts endorsed Prop 5, while opposing Prop 36. Whether they're just out-of-touch, trying to line their pockets, or listening to the wrong stakeholders (all of the above?)—they've got to start prioritizing what Bay Area voters need. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (7/14): Gov't dooms itself with math errors, thinly-disguised money grabs

Continuing our exclusive Election '24 analyses, Opp Now contributors argue that local/State gov't's tax mania ultimately brought the chandelier down on themselves this cycle (so to speak) via misguided measures RM4 and Prop 5. Featuring comments from: Cato Institute's Marc Joffe, HJTA's Jon Coupal, transit expert Tom Rubin, and real estate agent Mark Burns.

Read More
☆ Election 2024 is over; now, how do we overcome political polarization? (part 2)

Many free market-minded Bay Areans see wins in Nov. '24's rejection of tax-increasing Prop 5, passing of Prop 36, and more—but one local issue we can't vote away: extreme ideological divides. For this Opp Now exclusive, political science professors (UC Berkeley, Stanford, and University of SF) share insightful book recommendations on why we're so polarized today, what this means for local politics—and, yes, how to get back on track.

Read More
☆ Libertarian VP candidate Mike ter Maat: Although tax leery, Californians still split the ballot to borrow billions more (2/2)

The fed’s unsustainable financial house may not yet be affecting Californian voters as they decide just how much they want to let their state government borrow. Economist Mike ter Maat says Prop 5 likely failed because it would have enabled indescribable future debt that affects voters' taxes directly. Yet Props 2 and 4 sailed through, because proponents made a case for borrowing more billions—on top of our state deficit. An Opp Now exclusive Q&A.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (6/14): Local pols overlooked voters' actual wishes when falling for Prop 5

In Election '24, elected officials were so infatuated with tax-raising Proposition 5 that—um—they didn't realize the proposal would get an “I'm not interested” from 55.5% of CA'ns. Below, more Opp Now exclusive post-election analyses from Tom Wolf, Tom Rubin, Jon Coupal, and Pierluigi Oliverio.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (5/14): Experts recall spellbinding wins, surprises, takeaways from Nov. 2024

In this exclusive installment of a special Opp Now Election '24 series, our contributors aren't dancing around the issues: they unpack, below, some key City/County election results—including how “low information voters” impact which candidates are, or aren't, given a whirl in office. From Tobin Gilman (SJ community leader), Gus Mattammal (Midcoast Community councilmember), Mark Burns (local real estate agent), and Pierluigi Oliverio (SJ planning commissioner).

Read More
☆ Why local voters passed Proposition 36—by a gigantic margin

Welp, it happened: 69.8% of Bay Areans (and 68.9% CA-wide) voted “yes” to reinstating felony charges for certain property crimes and establishing “treatment-mandated felonies” for some repeat offenders. But why was Prop 36 so overwhelmingly supported? In this exclusive, we trace back Opp Now's Prop 47 & Prop 36 coverage, beginning in January 2022 and up 'til Election Day.

Read More