Posts in Special Reports
☆ Election roundup (13/14): Will gov't stop splurging and actually balance the budget?

In the wake of Election ‘24, Opp Now contributors wonder if State gov't might fix its $68 bn deficit with smarter budgeting (um, it's about time)—or keep throwing taxpayers’ cash to flashy but trivial projects. An Opp Now exclusive featuring: local realtor Mark Burns, past mayor Lydia Kou, transit expert Tom Rubin, and HJTA's Susan Shelley.

Read More
☆ Opinion: Change of administrations should doom San Francisco’s $8 billion rail extension

With the incoming Trump administration planning to defund California High-Speed Rail, it’s time for local transit officials to revisit the already weak case for extending HSR and Caltrain from 4th and King Street in San Francisco 1.3 miles to Salesforce Transit Center. Below, an Opp Now exclusive analysis from Contra Costa Taxpayers Association prez Marc Joffe.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (12/14): Will State gov't (finally) cut ties with oppressive programs and regulations?

Boondoggle transit projects. Overbearing environmental reqt's. (And that's just the tip of the iceberg.) In this exclusive, Opp Now contributors suggest changes in gov't at the city, county, state, and federal level could mean less Fed funding for HSR and BART's extension—and “aggressive deregulation” on local water/energy. More comments, below, from: Cato Institute's Marc Joffe, CPC's Edward Ring, Midcoast Community Council's Gus Mattammal, and SVTA's Pierluigi Oliverio.

Read More
☆ Mark Burns: Why does so-called “affordable” housing cost taxpayers twice the market rate to build? (2/2)

Outside of highly regulated government housing projects, which can cost $1 million per unit, the real price of similar dwellings is about half as much. So says Silicon Valley realtor Mark Burns, who provides a healthy reality check in this Opp Now exclusive Q&A. Despite the passage of statewide bonds this year, Prop 5 may have failed because taxpayers are tired of throwing away money and, as he says, lowering bond approval to 55% would be “terrible.”

Read More
☆ A Thanksgiving lesson

Per our annual Opp Now tradition, we hit replay on a beloved short essay by Peter Coe Verbica. He reflects, below, on those inexplicable moments of renewal and recovery we might experience during the holidays—prompted by the loveliness found in ordinary activities, objects, and surroundings. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ Mark Burns: Prop 5’s defeat shields communities from high-interest loans that cost twice as much to pay back (1/2)

Bonds can double repayment costs, burdening property owners for decades, especially in today's higher interest rate environment. So says Silicon Valley realtor Mark Burns, who sat on two school bond oversight committees. Prop 5 and RM4 promised similar oversight bodies, but Burns says they’d only pay “lip service” to the idea of accountability. Prevailing wage requirements, for example, force districts to pay astronomically inflated prices. An Opp Now exclusive Q&A.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (9/14): Voters swept off their feet by alluring tax hikes

Voters rejected Prop 5 this cycle, which would've opened the door to unrestricted gov't borrowing. Yet, other expensive ballot measures like Prop 2 and Measure R (both nobly dressed up as “saving our schools”) were passed. More Opp Now exclusive analyses—of what some perceive as Election 2024's biggest disappointments—below from SVTA's Mark Hinkle, HJTA's Jon Coupal, and CFR's Pat Waite.

Read More
☆ Tom Rubin: Beware the Son-of-RM4, another plea for MTC to spoil its constituents (2/2)

Transit consultant Tom Rubin warns that MTC’s BAHFA could give birth to another ill-conceived prodigality in the billions of dollars. On the 2026 ballot, they may also ask Bay Area voters for a transit tax. Statewide, the legislature could try to amend the constitution just to thwart taxpayer protections, while Sac targets cities who don’t want to stack ‘n pack themselves into dissipation. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ Tom Rubin: Prop 5’s defeat leaves Bay Area’s activist agencies in terrible shape (1/2)

Out-of-touch housing activists failed to broaden their appeal to the everyday taxpayer—could that explain why Prop 5 got “slapped down?” Tom Rubin, co-founder of the grassroots group that likely nudged RM4 off the ballot earlier this year, points out MTC/BAHFA still haven’t gotten the message. They insist on bond money going to prevailing wage contracts, thus inflating the cost of “affordable” housing. An Opp Now exclusive Q&A.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (8/14): Elected officials do as *they* wish, ignore residents’ best interests

Former Palo Alto mayor Lydia Kou and Recovery Education Coalition founder Tom Wolf find it near-inconceivable that many local gov’ts endorsed Prop 5, while opposing Prop 36. Whether they're just out-of-touch, trying to line their pockets, or listening to the wrong stakeholders (all of the above?)—they've got to start prioritizing what Bay Area voters need. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (7/14): Gov't dooms itself with math errors, thinly-disguised money grabs

Continuing our exclusive Election '24 analyses, Opp Now contributors argue that local/State gov't's tax mania ultimately brought the chandelier down on themselves this cycle (so to speak) via misguided measures RM4 and Prop 5. Featuring comments from: Cato Institute's Marc Joffe, HJTA's Jon Coupal, transit expert Tom Rubin, and real estate agent Mark Burns.

Read More
☆ Election 2024 is over; now, how do we overcome political polarization? (part 2)

Many free market-minded Bay Areans see wins in Nov. '24's rejection of tax-increasing Prop 5, passing of Prop 36, and more—but one local issue we can't vote away: extreme ideological divides. For this Opp Now exclusive, political science professors (UC Berkeley, Stanford, and University of SF) share insightful book recommendations on why we're so polarized today, what this means for local politics—and, yes, how to get back on track.

Read More