SF voters start to repair decades of ruinous far-left policies
Depicted: San Francisco city hall after 1906 earthquake. Image in public domain
The results from this week's voting in that fair suburb to the north suggest that SF voters may finally be starting to get real about reversing the wild-eyed progressive policies that have turned their once-proud metropolis into a case study in municipal mismanagement. Axios reports below.
San Francisco voters have weighed in on ballot measures related to housing, police staffing, surveillance and more.
Why it matters: The city has well-documented issues with affordable housing, drug use and public safety, which has resulted in division among moderates and progressives in the city regarding how to address these contentious topics.
Here's where the local propositions stand, according to the city's elections department's latest preliminary results.
Of note: Each measure requires a simple majority to pass, except for Prop. A, which requires nearly 67% affirmative votes to pass.
Proposition A: Affordable housing
Asks voters whether the city should issue $300 million in bonds to fund affordable housing construction amid a state mandate to build more than 46,000 affordable homes by 2031.
67.7% supported, 32.3% opposed.
Proposition B: Police staffing
A controversial measure that seeks to set minimum staffing levels for the city's police department, potentially diverting tax revenues from other sources or creating a new tax.
Proponents say the measure would help the police department address staffing shortages, while some critics argue police staffing levels have little impact on reducing crime.
67.4% opposed, 32.6% supported.
Proposition C: Office-to-housing conversions
Designed to incentivize office-to-housing conversions amid San Francisco's climbing office vacancy rate, this measure would implement transfer tax exemptions the first time commercial buildings are transferred to new owners for residential purposes.
53.9% supported, 46.1% opposed.
Proposition D: City ethics rules
Aims to expand the list of gifts city employees are prohibited from accepting and prohibit city employees from accepting "anything of value for themselves or a third party with the goal of influencing any government action."
88% supported, 12% opposed.
Proposition E: Police surveillance, vehicle pursuits
Another controversial measure that would enable the police to chase people suspected of committing felonies or misdemeanors, use drones for car chases, and install public surveillance cameras with facial recognition technology.
Proponents argue the measure would help police prevent and solve crime, while opponents say police chases are dangerous and that surveillance tech unjustly targets communities of color.
60% supported, 40% opposed.
Proposition F: Welfare drug screening
If passed, anyone who receives financial benefits from San Francisco's County Adult Assistance Program could be subject to drug screening.
Opponents call the measure "dangerous and punitive," while proponents argue it would help get people into drug treatment programs.
63% supported, 37% opposed.
Proposition G: Eighth-grade algebra
Would make it city policy to encourage the school board to resume teaching algebra in eighth grade.
The school board last month already approved a plan to offer eighth-grade algebra beginning next school year.
84% supported, 16% opposed.
This article originally appeared in Axios. Read the whole thing here.
Related:
Follow Opportunity Now on Twitter @svopportunity
Opp Now enthusiastically welcomes smart, thoughtful, fair-minded, well-written comments from our readers. But be advised: we have zero interest in posting rants, ad hominems, poorly-argued screeds, transparently partisan yack, or the hateful name-calling often seen on other local websites. So if you've got a great idea that will add to the conversation, please send it in. If you're trolling or shilling for a candidate or initiative, forget it.