Opinion: Why journalists should wear the philosopher's cloak more often

George Edward Robertson: Marc Antony’s Oration as Caeser’s Funeral, late 19th Century. Image in Public Domain

In a world christened “Post-Truth” and drowning in wave after wave of superficial trends, The Critique's founding editor-in-chief Guillaume A.W. Attia looks to an unexpected figure—the philosopher—for journalism's next steps. Below, Attia reflects on two reasons why philosophy should be embraced by news analysis sites such as Opp Now (and we gratefully lend him our ears).

There are two main ways in which analytic philosophy can make news analysis, particularly opinion journalism, better. First, philosophers can draw out the philosophical implications of stories in the news, and secondly, by restricting journalists to precise concepts and valid arguments, philosophers can improve the work of public advocacy journalists undertake (especially editorial boards) for the public interest both at home and abroad.

Let’s start with the first point: Because of the breadth of topics academic philosophers cover, they are able not only to identify philosophical ideas in the news that editors might miss but also help journalists do the explanatory work of articulating the significance of those ideas and why they make sense of the world.

Sign up to receive updates on Opp Now articles. Click HERE.

One way in which philosophers can help journalists make better sense of the world is by clarifying the meaning, and appropriate usage of key concepts, which when misused prevent interlocutors in a debate from making significant progress on an issue. ‘Gun control’ (for example) is just one of many buzzwords currently clouding political discourse and contributing to the stifling of political progress. Philosophers can bring an end to this confusion by delineating when, and when not, to use other heavy-loaded — but loosely employed — terms such as racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobe, etc.…

In addition to improving the language that journalists use, philosophers can improve the arguments that journalists make. They can prevent errors in thinking which often lead otherwise smart news commentators and their followers to bad conclusions about what to think and how to respond to a political issue.

Beyond explaining how the world is, with the help of the logical tools at their disposal, philosophers can also help columnists put together various arguments that explain how the world ought to be. On the global stage, philosophers can, for example, help foreign policy experts (many of them journalists) think more rigorously about the ethics of war, particularly whether to consider an emerging conflict an ‘unjust war.’

At the more local level, philosophers can assist journalists interested in social justice issues, such as those concerning the criminal justice system, do a better job of explaining the moral failures at work in society, as well as construct coherent arguments that more successfully defend their proposed solutions to these problems.

There are many other issues that journalists cover on a regular basis to which philosophers can lend their expertise; but it is important to recognize that this is not simply about ameliorating the services that the news industry provides to the public. Philosophy itself matters. One can only hope that the news media provides a powerful vehicle for consequential and world-changing philosophical ideas to reach a much broader audience, inspiring and provoking people to action, while strengthening journalists to boldly confront the challenges of this quickly changing world.

Read the whole thing here.

Related:

• Perspective: Local watchdogs paving the way to media literacy

• What's up with confirmation bias journalism?

• Media expert: Digital reader-based “post-journalism” model promotes polarization

Follow Opportunity Now on Twitter @svopportunity

Sign up to receive updates on Opp Now articles

Email Address:

First Name:

Last Name:

Opp Now enthusiastically welcomes smart, thoughtful, fair-minded, well-written comments from our readers. But be advised: we have zero interest in posting rants, ad hominems, poorly-argued screeds, transparently partisan yack, or the hateful name-calling often seen on other local websites. So if you've got a great idea that will add to the conversation, please send it in. If you're trolling or shilling for a candidate or initiative, forget it.