☆ “More disappointed than shocked”: Stanford student org pres on Woke college takeovers
Last week, Stanford students/a DEI admin aggressively heckled controversial guest speaker Judge Kyle Duncan, disrupting and cutting short his prepared talk. Tim Rosenberger, Jr., president of Stanford Law’s Federalist Society chapter, sits down with Opp Now for an exclusive breakdown of Stanford’s dangerously “comfort”-driven student/faculty culture—and his proposed steps to restore diverse thought to the revered university.
Opportunity Now: Several years ago, when angry students trashed UC Berkeley in anticipation of conservative speaker Milo Yiannopoulos, many were—unfortunately—not surprised. Certain law schools like Yale’s are now commonly known as politically closed-minded.
But this recent incident at Stanford University shocked many, who expected more from this venerated institution and law school. Did it surprise you that something like this happened on your campus?
Tim Rosenberger, Jr.: Milo is a friend and, while he sometimes invites unthoughtful reactions from others, he is an incredibly smart and complicated thinker, particularly on issues of identity and faith. I hope that the nuance of his work comes to be more appreciated.
The law school is a particularly challenged place at Stanford. The entire campus is more committed to making students comfortable than to promoting the hard work of scholarly inquiry. As Benedict the XVI says, we are not called to comfort; we are called to greatness. I hope students and faculty will join me in the work of learning.
Sadly, I’m more disappointed than shocked. I worked very hard this year to build relationships with administrators and students with opposing viewpoints. None of those relationships mattered when it came time to take a stand for the Judge’s right to speak. It’s really disappointing and a reminder that there is a lot of work to be done.
ON: For First Amendment advocates, it was a welcome surprise to read Stanford president Tessier-Lavigne and law school dean Martinez’s formal apology to Judge Duncan this Monday. This was particularly surprising given how recent free speech controversies at law school student orgs have played out (looking at you, Yale).
Do you think the tide might be changing, in terms of public backlash to universities’ cancel culture responses?
TRJ: Law schools and the legal profession are realizing that they are creating an interlocking pipeline of incompetence run by, and creating, unserious people. The Dean’s letter was an important first step. I look forward to working with her to make this situation right. My sense is that America’s elite universities may be losing the public’s confidence.
ON: What changes do you hope to see at Stanford moving forward to ensure a safe and ideologically rigorous environment? In other words, is Stanford Law doomed to becoming just another progressive echo chamber, or do you see a way out?
TRJ: Stanford Law sees itself as different from all but a handful of other law schools. It doesn’t produce lawyers so much as judges, scholars, and policy makers. Consequently, it focuses less on teaching what the law is and how it can be used, and more on what the law “should” be. In this way, it operates somewhat like a godless progressive seminary, working to rally the faithful for lives of vocation. Stanford, like many failed wealthy seminaries, has the money to soldier on indefinitely.
Let’s hope for something better! Stanford needs to take three key changes to ensure its future. First, it needs to strongly commit to free speech. This means that people may have to accept discomfort and that stifling others, even unpopular others, results in consequences. Second, there needs to be real diversity of thought on the faculty. There are six originalists and three Trump appointees on the Supreme Court. There is one right of center legal scholar, and are no open Trump voters, on Stanford’s law faculty. Finally, admissions of students and hiring of faculty and administrators must be rigorous and based on quantified excellence, not activism.
ON: Federalist Society university chapters are no stranger to invited speakers being ambushed and aggressed via heckling. This incident wasn’t the first time and likely won’t be the last.
What keeps the Stanford FedSoc group going; what encourages you all amid an increasingly ideologically hostile culture?
TRJ: We have a great community—I have many lifelong friends from FedSoc, including folks who graduated three years ago. I am sustained by my faith. One assumes that being in the right is also invigorating!
This article is part of an Opp Now series on the Stanford Law free speech scandal—and its aftermath:
Fifth Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan was shouted down last week at a Stanford Law School event, and the disruption was supported by Associate Dean of DEI Tirien Steinbach. David Lat's exceptional Original Jurisdiction has the whole story here.
Campus Reform reports that a group of Stanford students are urging the university to dismiss DEI Dean Steinbach.
In the wake of Stanford University’s free speech colloquies, Daniel McCarthy of the NY Post digs into Leftism’s aversion to differences.
Opp Now analyzes Stanford Law’s Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Spoiler alert: They, and heckler-sympathizer Dean Steinbach, may not be doing all that much.
TXEER Politics and Religion Board user pvbmtnr considers the binary thinking separating free speech and DEI—as especially located in Dean Steinbach’s WSJ defense piece.
Tim Rosenberger, Jr. assesses why a few prominent judges have announced they will stop hiring Stanford Law grads.
John Banzhaf is brandishing the potentially career-killing threat of bar complaints against Stanford Law students who heckled federal judge Kyle Duncan.
Reason's Josh Blackman unravels how DEI has stuck its nose into all issues possibly correlated with discrimination (big surprise: it's most of them).
Campus Reform breaks down DEI Dean Steinbach's rampant—and easily accessible—history of opposing law enforcement, criminal justice systems, and, yes, the “patriarchy.”
Stanford's Federalist Society student org president Tim Rosenberger, Jr. discusses how labeling all nonconformists as “far-right” is divisive.
Althouse explains why these university scandals continue happening: As the extremists get louder, the moderates get quieter.
After Stanford's free speech disaster, many are questioning if DEI jobs belong in education, including past USD board runner Zoila Herrera Rollins.
The Free Press’s Bari Weiss unpacks why we should pay attention to universities’ free speech incidents: Young people are powerfully shaping our institutions—and our collective future.
Follow Opportunity Now on Twitter @svopportunity
Image by Wikimedia Commons
