Local gas ban: Gruesome for wallets and power grid, dubiously “green”

A recent vote by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to wean off and ultimately prohibit gas furnaces/water heaters has been widely questioned by economic and energy experts. Critics say the ordinance will be costly for locals and overwhelming for our electric grid, while meagerly beneficial to the environment. Ryan Mills at the National Review gives the details.

A vote last week by the Bay Area’s air-pollution regulators to phase out and eventually ban the sale of new gas furnaces and water heaters in the Northern California region will be costly for residents, will further burden an already stretched electric grid, and will have minimal environmental impact, energy experts and economists told National Review.

The move is emblematic of California’s approach to energy, which involves ramping up the demand for electricity while gutting the state’s ability to meet its electricity needs, they said.

And requiring Bay Area residents to replace broken gas furnaces and water heaters with all-electric systems, which are harder to install and can require expensive home retrofits, could also be dangerous, potentially leaving people without heat for weeks during the winter.

The vote by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to ban the sale of new gas furnaces and water heaters, is “a regressive policy that’s going to increase costs in a state that is already unaffordable, it’s going to do minimal in terms of reducing [greenhouse-gas] emissions, and it’s going to stress a problem that we already have no plan of addressing, which is [that] our grid is going to be unable to provide reliable electricity,” said Wayne Winegarden, a senior fellow in business and economics at the California-based Pacific Research Institute who is studying the state’s electricity shortfall.

This article originally appeared in the National Review. Read the whole thing here.

Follow Opportunity Now on Twitter @svopportunity

Image by 41330